Paul v Cooke [2011] NSWSC 959
Leave to amend the statement of claim refused as to paragraphs 21(c) and 24(b) on the basis that the proposed amendments are irrelevant in light of the joint expert report, which answered the relevant questions in the negative, and there being no submission to reject the report. Leave granted only for additional particulars to paragraph 25, as agreed by the parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Leave granted to amend paragraph 25; leave refused for other proposed amendments.
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Statement of Claim' 'leave to Amend Pleadings' 'relevance of Particulars' 'joint Expert Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether plaintiff should be granted leave to amend statement of claim to include additional particulars and to qualify previous assertions regarding the condition of the aneurysm']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend the statement of claim refused as to paragraphs 21(c) and 24(b) on the basis that the proposed amendments are irrelevant in light of the joint expert report, which answered the relevant questions in the negative, and there being no submission to reject the report. Leave granted only for additional particulars to paragraph 25, as agreed by the parties.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to amend paragraph 25; leave refused for other proposed amendments.
Orders
- ['Leave granted to plaintiff to amend statement of claim by filing further amended statement of claim adding three additional particulars to paragraph 25.' 'Leave to amend paragraphs 21(c) and 24(b) refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment