Reid v Wright [2014] NSWSC 904
Ms Reid was entitled to a legible copy of Ms Wright's file notes, and the defendant delayed unnecessarily in providing transcription. Therefore, the defendant should pay the costs of the motion.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Christine Reid; Defendant: Diane Wright t/a D M Wright and Associates Solicitors
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Determination Following Motion
- Outcome
- Defendant ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of her motion filed 12 May 2014.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Request for Transcription of Solicitor's File Notes, Delay in Complying, Necessity of Transcription
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christine Reid
Plaintiff
Diane Wright t/a D M Wright and Associates Solicitors
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Determination Following Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant should pay the costs of the plaintiff's motion for transcription of solicitor's file notes
- 2 Whether delay in compliance with request for transcription justifies a costs order
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Reid was entitled to a legible copy of Ms Wright's file notes, and the defendant delayed unnecessarily in providing transcription. Therefore, the defendant should pay the costs of the motion.
Court Disposition
Defendant ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of her motion filed 12 May 2014.
Orders
- Order the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of her motion filed 12 May 2014, assessed in the sum of $600.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment