Regina v Astles [2001] NSWCCA 235

Regina v Astles [2001] NSWCCA 235

The sentences were not manifestly excessive. The sentencing judge did not err in treating the applicant's criminal history, gave adequate weight to the guilty pleas and limited evidence of remorse, was entitled to reject a causal connection between the applicant's emotional problems and the offending, and imposed sentences within the available range that were properly structured consistently with Pearce.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'guilty Plea' 'totality' 'concurrent and Cumulative Sentences' 'remorse' 'general Deterrence' 'subjective Circumstances']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing' 'criminal Procedure'] ['manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'guilty Plea' 'totality' 'concurrent and Cumulative Sentences' 'remorse' 'general Deterrence' 'subjective Circumstances']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Law Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the overall sentence was manifestly excessive having regard to the objective criminality and subjective circumstances.' "Whether the sentencing judge overstated the applicant's criminal history." 'Whether the sentences reflected a real discount for the pleas of guilty and early confessions.' "Whether the applicant's expressed remorse warranted further mitigation." "Whether the applicant's emotional, psychological or psychiatric condition reduced culpability or the weight to be given to general deterrence."]

Ratio Decidendi

The sentences were not manifestly excessive. The sentencing judge did not err in treating the applicant's criminal history, gave adequate weight to the guilty pleas and limited evidence of remorse, was entitled to reject a causal connection between the applicant's emotional problems and the offending, and imposed sentences within the available range that were properly structured consistently with Pearce.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']