Breheny (by his Tutor Gary Breheny) v Cairncross & 2 Ors [2002] NSWCA 69
The trial judge erred by not considering the principle in Wickstead v Browne, which precludes the summary dismissal of one defendant before the main defendant's case is heard. The order for summary dismissal against the doctors must be set aside, and the appeal allowed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Christopher Breheny (by his Tutor Gary Breheny); Respondent: David John Cairncross; Respondent: Gordon Vincent Oxenham; Respondent: Lachlan Area Health Service
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Natural Justice, Summary Dismissal, Interlocutory Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Breheny (by his Tutor Gary Breheny)
Appellant
David John Cairncross
Respondent
Gordon Vincent Oxenham
Respondent
Lachlan Area Health Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in summarily dismissing the claim against the doctors due to evidentiary deficiencies before hearing the main case.
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred by not considering the principle in Wickstead v Browne, which precludes the summary dismissal of one defendant before the main defendant's case is heard. The order for summary dismissal against the doctors must be set aside, and the appeal allowed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal be allowed, the judgment in the court below be set aside.
- In lieu thereof there be an order dismissing the motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment