Regina v Munro [2001] NSWCCA 187
The trial judge was entitled to find beyond reasonable doubt that when the fatal blows were struck, the appellant had ceased to believe it was necessary to act in self-defence and had no reasonable grounds for such belief; the Act did not modify the common law but codified it; the appeal grounds were not made out.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['manslaughter' 'self Defence' 'home Invasion (occupants Protection) Act 1998']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the verdict was unreasonable and not supported by the evidence' 'Whether the occasion for self-defence had ceased when the fatal blows were struck' 'Whether there was evidence to support the finding that the fatal head injury to the victim was inflicted by the last blow or blows delivered immediately before he fell to the ground' 'Whether the Act declared and clarified the common law' 'Whether the Act extended the rights of an occupier at common law']
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to find beyond reasonable doubt that when the fatal blows were struck, the appellant had ceased to believe it was necessary to act in self-defence and had no reasonable grounds for such belief; the Act did not modify the common law but codified it; the appeal grounds were not made out.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal against conviction dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment