Cherry v R [2017] NSWCCA 150
The aggregate sentence imposed reflected the seriousness of repeated domestic violence breaches and a serious break and enter offence, with adequate consideration given to rehabilitation and circumstances; no error or manifest excess in sentence was demonstrated.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal; Leave to Appeal Granted, Appeal Determined
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence Appeal' 'domestic Violence' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'break and Enter' 'robbery' 'aggregate Sentence' 'objective Seriousness' 'rehabilitation' 'manifest Excess']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal; Leave to Appeal Granted, Appeal Determined
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the offence under s.112(2) Crimes Act 1900 was in the mid-range of seriousness' 'Whether insufficient weight was given to rehabilitation' 'Whether the aggregate sentence was manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The aggregate sentence imposed reflected the seriousness of repeated domestic violence breaches and a serious break and enter offence, with adequate consideration given to rehabilitation and circumstances; no error or manifest excess in sentence was demonstrated.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment