Fitzgerald v Westpac Banking Corporation [2011] FCA 124
The notices to produce were set aside because they constituted an impermissible attempt to obtain general discovery by seeking an amorphous collection of documents at a premature stage, without demonstrating sufficient relevance or relation to live issues in the proceedings.
- Parties
- Applicant/cross Claimant: Peter Fitzgerald; Applicant: Christopher Finn; Applicant: Danielle Lavers; Cross Claimant: Jeff Sheehan; First Cross Respondent: Gregory Michael Bartlett; Second Cross Respondent: Greg Kenny; Cross Claimant: Glenn Wittingslow; Respondent/third Cross Respondent/first Cross Respondent: Westpac Banking Corporation ACN 007 457 141; Fourth Cross Respondent/second Cross Respondent: Chubb Insurance Company of Australia Limited ACN 003 710 647; Fifth Cross Respondent/third Cross Respondent: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited ACN 000 122 850
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Notices to Produce
- Outcome
- Notices to produce set aside; cost orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Notice to Produce, Discovery, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Fitzgerald
Applicant/cross Claimant
Christopher Finn
Applicant
Danielle Lavers
Applicant
Jeff Sheehan
Cross Claimant
Gregory Michael Bartlett
First Cross Respondent
Greg Kenny
Second Cross Respondent
Glenn Wittingslow
Cross Claimant
Westpac Banking Corporation ACN 007 457 141
Respondent/third Cross Respondent/first Cross Respondent
Chubb Insurance Company of Australia Limited ACN 003 710 647
Fourth Cross Respondent/second Cross Respondent
Allianz Australia Insurance Limited ACN 000 122 850
Fifth Cross Respondent/third Cross Respondent
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Notices to Produce
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notices to produce served on the insurers should be set aside as an abuse of process or as an impermissible attempt to seek general discovery
- 2 Whether the notices to produce sought documents for a legitimate forensic purpose and were relevant
Ratio Decidendi
The notices to produce were set aside because they constituted an impermissible attempt to obtain general discovery by seeking an amorphous collection of documents at a premature stage, without demonstrating sufficient relevance or relation to live issues in the proceedings.
Court Disposition
Notices to produce set aside; cost orders made.
Orders
- The cross-claimants' notices to produce, addressed to Chubb Insurance Company of Australia Limited and Allianz Australia Insurance Limited, dated 4 February 2011, be set aside.
- The party who served the notices to produce pay the costs of the insurers on whom notice was served, in respect of the notice of motion filed to set aside the notices, as agreed or assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment