Murtough v Randwick City Council [2004] NSWLEC 505
The Court, having inspected the site and heard from both parties and nearby residents, accepted agreed amendments to the Council's order to reduce and modify the retaining walls and landscaping to address unreasonable impacts on adjoining properties' amenity.
- Parties
- Applicant: Christopher George Murtough; Respondent: Randwick City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Order varied and works specified; appeal otherwise resolved by consent.
- Legal Topics
- Retaining Wall Approval, Impact on Neighbouring Properties, Council Enforcement Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher George Murtough
Applicant
Randwick City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the impact of the retaining wall as constructed is excessive in terms of amenity on adjoining neighbours
- 2 Whether the impact of the retaining wall where it adjoins 11A Farnham Avenue is unreasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, having inspected the site and heard from both parties and nearby residents, accepted agreed amendments to the Council's order to reduce and modify the retaining walls and landscaping to address unreasonable impacts on adjoining properties' amenity.
Court Disposition
Order varied and works specified; appeal otherwise resolved by consent.
Orders
- Order under s 121(b) amended: reducing wall height where adjoins 11A Farnham Ave; specific height, stepping, and landscaping requirements for sections adjoining different neighbouring properties as per order.
- Works to reduce height of retaining walls to be completed within three months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment