Field v Perpetual Limited [2010] FCA 1001
The Applicant's claims disclosed no tenable cause of action and had no reasonable prospect of success: the loan and mortgage were established, the alleged disclosure and correspondence matters did not amount to unconscionable conduct, hardship relief was unavailable because the loan exceeded the applicable threshold, the complaint about pursuit of debt and possession misconceived the statutory distribution of mortgagee sale proceeds, ss 12EA and 12EB of the ASIC Act were not engaged, and the Crimes Act allegation was without foundation. The proceeding was also an abuse of process and vexatious because it sought to re-litigate matters raised in the Supreme Court of Victoria and...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure; Application for Injunction and Damages for Alleged Unconscionable Conduct / Respondent's Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment or Dismissal Under S 31 a of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (cth) and O 20 R 5 of the Federal Court Rules
- Outcome
- Proceeding dismissed; Applicant ordered to pay the Respondent's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Judgment' 'no Reasonable Prospect of Success' 'abuse of Process' 'vexatious Proceeding' 'unconscionable Conduct' 'mortgage Possession Proceedings' 'attempt to Re Litigate Supreme Court of Victoria Issues']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure; Application for Injunction and Damages for Alleged Unconscionable Conduct / Respondent's Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment or Dismissal Under S 31 a of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (cth) and O 20 R 5 of the Federal Court Rules
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Applicant had no reasonable prospect of successfully prosecuting the proceeding.' 'Whether the proceeding was frivolous, vexatious or an abuse of process.' "Whether the Respondent's alleged failures of disclosure, non-response to correspondence, refusal of hardship relief, and pursuit of possession and debt amounted to unconscionable conduct under the ASIC Act." 'Whether ss 12EA and 12EB of the ASIC Act were engaged by the Respondent commencing possession proceedings in the Supreme Court of Victoria and relying on Victorian legislation.' 'Whether the Federal Court could set aside or restrain enforcement of the Supreme Court of Victoria judgment.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicant's claims disclosed no tenable cause of action and had no reasonable prospect of success: the loan and mortgage were established, the alleged disclosure and correspondence matters did not amount to unconscionable conduct, hardship relief was unavailable because the loan exceeded the applicable threshold, the complaint about pursuit of debt and possession misconceived the statutory distribution of mortgagee sale proceeds, ss 12EA and 12EB of the ASIC Act were not engaged, and the Crimes Act allegation was without foundation. The proceeding was also an abuse of process and vexatious because it sought to re-litigate matters raised in the Supreme Court of Victoria and...
Court Disposition
Proceeding dismissed; Applicant ordered to pay the Respondent's costs.
Orders
- ['The proceeding is dismissed.' "The Applicant pay the Respondent's costs of the proceeding, such costs to be taxed in default of agreement."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment