Cahill v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2008] FCA 495
A penalty should be imposed on the CFMEU for deliberate breaches in seeking strike pay and organizing industrial action, despite legitimate safety concerns, applying the totality principle and weighing in mitigating factors including co-operation and changed industry practice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Penalty Proceeding / Penalty Assessment
- Outcome
- Penalty imposed on first respondent; declarations made against second and third respondents; no penalty imposed on individuals.
- Legal Topics
- ['industrial Action' 'strike Pay' 'safety Concerns' 'penalty Assessment' 'totality Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Penalty Proceeding / Penalty Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether penalty should be imposed for breach of s 187AB of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)' 'Assessment of appropriate penalty for breach of statutory prohibition on strike pay']
Ratio Decidendi
A penalty should be imposed on the CFMEU for deliberate breaches in seeking strike pay and organizing industrial action, despite legitimate safety concerns, applying the totality principle and weighing in mitigating factors including co-operation and changed industry practice.
Court Disposition
Penalty imposed on first respondent; declarations made against second and third respondents; no penalty imposed on individuals.
Orders
- ['A penalty of $4,000 is imposed on the first respondent for breach of s 187AB of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth).' 'It is declared that the second and third respondents have each contravened s 187AB of the Act.' 'The penalty is to be paid into consolidated revenue on or before 11 June 2008.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment