Burgess v Gunnedah Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 97

Burgess v Gunnedah Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 97

The council failed to properly assess that the modifications to the development consent would be of minimal environmental impact as required by s 96(1A)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the modified conditions increased the potential environmental impact beyond the statutory threshold.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 June 2010
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Declaratory Relief / Ex Tempore Judgment
Outcome
Application granted by consent, decision invalid and set aside
Legal Topics
['modification of Development Consent' 'environmental Impact' 'declaratory and Injunctive Relief' 'costs']
['planning and Environment'] ['modification of Development Consent' 'environmental Impact' 'declaratory and Injunctive Relief' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Declaratory Relief / Ex Tempore Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the modification of development consent was of minimal environmental impact under s 96(1A)(a) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether the modified consent should be set aside']

Ratio Decidendi

The council failed to properly assess that the modifications to the development consent would be of minimal environmental impact as required by s 96(1A)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the modified conditions increased the potential environmental impact beyond the statutory threshold.

Court Disposition

Application granted by consent, decision invalid and set aside

Orders

  • ["The first respondent's decision on 4 November 2009 to modify development consent no 387585 is invalid." 'The decision of the first respondent made on 4 November 2009 be set aside.' "The first respondent to pay the applicant's costs as agreed or assessed." 'The exhibit is to be returned.']