Henry v R [2009] NSWCCA 69
The sentencing judge did not err in rejecting the applicant's past sexual abuse as mitigating, appropriately assessed remorse and rehabilitation prospects, and the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive and fell within sound discretion.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal; Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; extension of time granted; leave to appeal granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence' 'indecent Assault' 'procuring Children for Pornographic Purposes' 'mitigation' 'remorse' 'rehabilitation' 'manifest Excess' 'cumulation of Sentences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal; Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge erred in rejecting the applicant's history of childhood sexual abuse as mitigating." 'Whether the assessment of remorse and rehabilitation prospects was erroneous.' 'Whether the individual and total sentences imposed were manifestly excessive.']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not err in rejecting the applicant's past sexual abuse as mitigating, appropriately assessed remorse and rehabilitation prospects, and the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive and fell within sound discretion.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; extension of time granted; leave to appeal granted.
Orders
- ['Time for filing the notice of appeal extended.' 'Leave to appeal against sentence granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment