R v Paton [2014] NSWSC 71
The offender, though not the principal, for many hours knew a murder was to occur, accompanied and by his presence intentionally encouraged or assisted the principal offender, and displayed grave objective criminality warranting a substantial custodial sentence, especially given his prior record, lack of remorse, and the aggravating fact of being on parole.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Defendant: Christopher John Paton
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence After Conviction by Jury
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Accessory Liability, Sentencing, Disputed Facts, Reliability of Witness, Parole
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Christopher John Paton
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence After Conviction by Jury
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether offender's active involvement constituted murder or mere accessory after the fact
- 2 Resolution of factual disputes affecting sentence, including awareness and encouragement/assistance of principal offender
- 3 Impact of offender’s prior record and parole status on sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The offender, though not the principal, for many hours knew a murder was to occur, accompanied and by his presence intentionally encouraged or assisted the principal offender, and displayed grave objective criminality warranting a substantial custodial sentence, especially given his prior record, lack of remorse, and the aggravating fact of being on parole.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- Sentenced to imprisonment for 19 years from 10 November 2011 to 9 November 2030.
- Non-parole period of 14 years 3 months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment