Jordan, Commissioner of Taxation v Second Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 1602
Disclosure of protected information relating to Mr Gould for use in the defamation proceedings was not authorised merely as disclosure in the performance of a taxation officer's duties under s 355-50(1), nor as disclosure for the purpose of administering any taxation law under Item 1 of s 355-50(2). However, the defamation proceedings were civil proceedings related to a taxation law because Mr Gould's pleaded defamatory imputations included tax fraud and the proceedings were likely to require consideration of the Hua Wang Bank litigation and compliance with taxation laws by Mr Gould and entities he controlled or managed. The proposed disclosure was therefore permitted under Item 3 of s...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Declaration Concerning Disclosure of Protected Taxpayer Information Under the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (cth) / Judgment on Application for Declaratory Relief
- Outcome
- Declaration made; disclosure permitted under s 355-50(2) Item 3 of Sch 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth).
- Legal Topics
- ['disclosure of Protected Information' 'taxation Officer Duties' 'civil Proceedings Related to a Taxation Law' 'schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (cth), Ss 355 25 and 355 50' 'use of ATO Documents in Defamation Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Declaration Concerning Disclosure of Protected Taxpayer Information Under the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (cth) / Judgment on Application for Declaratory Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether disclosure of documents in the control of the Australian Taxation Office relating to Mr Gould's taxation affairs for use in defamation proceedings would be in the performance of a taxation officer's duties under s 355-50(1) of Sch 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth)." 'Whether the proposed disclosure would be for the purpose of administering any taxation law within Item 1 of s 355-50(2) of Sch 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth).' 'Whether the proposed disclosure would be for the purpose of civil proceedings related to a taxation law within Item 3 of s 355-50(2) of Sch 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth).']
Ratio Decidendi
Disclosure of protected information relating to Mr Gould for use in the defamation proceedings was not authorised merely as disclosure in the performance of a taxation officer's duties under s 355-50(1), nor as disclosure for the purpose of administering any taxation law under Item 1 of s 355-50(2). However, the defamation proceedings were civil proceedings related to a taxation law because Mr Gould's pleaded defamatory imputations included tax fraud and the proceedings were likely to require consideration of the Hua Wang Bank litigation and compliance with taxation laws by Mr Gould and entities he controlled or managed. The proposed disclosure was therefore permitted under Item 3 of s...
Court Disposition
Declaration made; disclosure permitted under s 355-50(2) Item 3 of Sch 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth).
Orders
- ["To the extent that documents in the control of the Australian Taxation Office relating to the affairs of the Second Respondent contain protected information as defined in s 355-30(1) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), a disclosure of the documents by an entity who is a taxation officer to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment