In the matter of the Bankrupt Estate of Parsell, Brett John & Anor Chamberlain, Christopher Mel v Parsell, Brett John & Anor [1998] FCA 1660
The debtors failed to pay the $40,000 required by clause 5 of the deed of arrangement, which was sufficient to enliven section 236(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act irrespective of whether a clause 8 notice of default had been given. The creditors had unanimously resolved that the Trustee should make the application, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 to Terminate a Deed of Arrangement and Sequestrate Estates / Extempore Reasons for Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Application granted; deed of arrangement terminated; estates sequestrated; costs of the application to be costs in the bankruptcy.
- Legal Topics
- ['part X Deed of Arrangement' 'termination of Deed of Arrangement' 'sequestration of Estates' "creditors' Interests" 'default Under Deed']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 to Terminate a Deed of Arrangement and Sequestrate Estates / Extempore Reasons for Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the debtors failed to carry out or comply with clause 5 of the deed of arrangement by failing to pay $40,000 to the Trustee on or before 30 June 1998.' 'Whether the absence of evidence of a clause 8 notice of default prevented termination of the deed under section 236(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act.' 'Whether termination of the deed would be in the interests of creditors under section 236(2) of the Bankruptcy Act.']
Ratio Decidendi
The debtors failed to pay the $40,000 required by clause 5 of the deed of arrangement, which was sufficient to enliven section 236(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act irrespective of whether a clause 8 notice of default had been given. The creditors had unanimously resolved that the Trustee should make the application, and the affidavit evidence satisfied the Court that termination was in the interests of creditors. The deed was therefore terminated and the debtors' estates sequestrated.
Court Disposition
Application granted; deed of arrangement terminated; estates sequestrated; costs of the application to be costs in the bankruptcy.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to Section 236(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, the Deed of Arrangement between the Brett John Parsell and Carolyn May Parsell, the Debtors and Alan Richard Nicholls the Trustee, is terminated.' 'The estates of Brett John Parsell and Carolyn May Parsell be sequestrated forthwith.' 'The cost of this...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 8093 of 1998
IN THE MATTER OF BANKRUPT ESTATE OF BRETT JOHN PARSELL & CAROLYN MAY PARSELL
BETWEEN: CHRISTOPHER MEL CHAMBERLAIN
Applicant
AND: BRETT JOHN PARSELL & CAROLYN MAY PARSELL
Respondent
JUDGE: HELY
DATE OF ORDER: 18 DECEMBER 98
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Pursuant to Section 236(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, the Deed of Arrangement between the Brett John Parsell and Carolyn May Parsell, the Debtors and Alan Richard Nicholls the Trustee, is terminated. 2. The estates of Brett John Parsell and Carolyn May Parsell be sequestrated forthwith. 3. The cost of this application be costs in the bankruptcy. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 8093 of 1998
IN THE MATTER OF BANKRUPT ESTATE OF BRETT JOHN PARSELL & CAROLYN MAY PARSELL
BETWEEN: CHRISTOPHER MEL CHAMBERLAIN
Applicant
AND: BRETT JOHN PARSELL & CAROLYN MAY PARSELL
Respondent
JUDGE(S): HELY J
DATE: 18 december 98
PLACE: SYDNEY
EXTEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT HELY J: Though the evidence as to the service of this application on the debtors is unsatisfactory, I am satisfied on the basis of an affidavit of Andrew Robert Cameron of 17 December 1998 that the fact of these proceedings, and of the date for the hearing, has been drawn to the debtors attention. On 30 December 1997 the debtors entered into a deed of arrangement under Part X of the Bankruptcy Act. Clause 5 of the deed provided for payment of the sum of $40,000 to the Trustee on or before 30 June 1998. That sum was not paid. Hence I am satisfied in terms of section 236(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act that the debtors have failed to carry out or comply with the provision of clause 5 of the deed of arrangement. Clause 8 provides for notice of default to be given to the debtors and for them to have an opportunity of rectifying the default, failing which the Trustee shall be entitled to require the debtors to file a debtors petition. There is no evidence before me that a notice of the type called for by clause 8 has been given to the debtors. I do not think this matters, because whether or not such a notice has been given, the debtors have failed to carry out or comply with the provisions of clause 5. That default is sufficient to enliven the operation of section 236(1)(a) of the Act. Section 236(2) provides that an order terminating a deed on the ground specified in section 236(1)(a) is not to be made unless the Court is satisfied that it would be in the interest of the creditors to make such an order. A meeting of creditors took place on 16 September, 1998. At that meeting it was unanimously resolved that the Trustee should make this application. I am satisfied upon the basis of the resolution carried at that meeting, and upon the basis of the matters deposed to in paragraph 7 of the affidavit of Alan Richard Nicholls of 25 September 1998, that it would be in the interests of the creditors to make an order terminating the deed. Accordingly, I make orders 1 and 2 in accordance with the application. I am not prepared at the moment to make an order in accordance with paragraph 3 simply because I am uncertain as to what the position is, but I reserve liberty to the applicant to make further application during the course of the day for an order in terms of paragraph 3 if so advised. I also order that the cost of this application be costs in the bankruptcy. I certify that this and the preceding one (1) pages are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Hely
Associate: Dated: 18 December 98
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Guilfoyle
Solicitor for the Applicant: Walsh & Blair Solicitors
Date of Hearing: 18 December 1998
Date of Judgment: 18 December 1998