Willis v R [2014] NSWDC 325
The applicant's failure to attend court, although partly his own fault, resulted from 'illness, misadventure or other cause' due to drug addiction, and in any event, it is in the interests of justice to allow annulment of the conviction. The appeal should be allowed and the matter remitted to the Local Court.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Refusal of Annulment Application; Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['annulment of Conviction' 'conviction in Absence' "interpretation of 'hindered' Under Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001 (nsw)" 'domestic Violence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Refusal of Annulment Application; Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant was 'hindered by accident, illness, misadventure or other cause' from attending court under s 8(2) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW)" "Whether self-induced drug intoxication qualifies as 'illness, misadventure or other cause' under the Act" 'Whether it is in the interests of justice to annul the conviction entered in absence']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's failure to attend court, although partly his own fault, resulted from 'illness, misadventure or other cause' due to drug addiction, and in any event, it is in the interests of justice to allow annulment of the conviction. The appeal should be allowed and the matter remitted to the Local Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Under s 16K of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001, the appeal is determined by granting the appeal and remitting the matter to the Local Court.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment