Sepasspour v Randwick City Council [2022] NSWLEC 1585
The amended Development Application adequately addresses jurisdictional and planning prerequisites, including a justified written request for variation to the height of buildings standard under cl 4.6 of the Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012. The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted subject to agreed conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'height of Buildings' 'variation Request' 'residential Flat Building' 'conciliation Conference' 'local Environmental Plan']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether consent should be granted to amended Development Application DA 161/2022' 'Whether the written request to vary the height of buildings development standard under cl 4.6 of the Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 should be upheld' "Whether amended application resolves the Respondent's contentions regarding bulk, scale, privacy, overshadowing, design quality, and other impacts" 'Whether all relevant jurisdictional requirements and development standards have been satisfied']
Ratio Decidendi
The amended Development Application adequately addresses jurisdictional and planning prerequisites, including a justified written request for variation to the height of buildings standard under cl 4.6 of the Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012. The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted subject to agreed conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted
Orders
- ['Leave granted to Applicant to amend Development Application DA 161/2022 and rely upon amended plans and documents referred to in condition 1 at Annexure A.' "Applicant to pay Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of amending the Development Application in the agreed sum of $4,500 pursuant to section 8.15(3)...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment