Regina v Maskey [2003] NSWSC 1029
The court found that Maskey intended to kill his wife, having previously stated intent and carried out the act with extreme violence, aggravated by use of a knife and breach of bond. Mitigation factors were considered, including lack of prior custodial sentence and head injury, sufficient for special circumstances, but little weight was given to provocation or remorse. Accordingly, a twenty-year sentence with a fourteen-year non-parole period was imposed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'sentencing' 'aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['appropriate sentence for murder' 'application of section 21A and repealed section 44 of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999' 'assessment of aggravating and mitigating circumstances' 'finding of special circumstances' 'weight given to guilty plea']
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Maskey intended to kill his wife, having previously stated intent and carried out the act with extreme violence, aggravated by use of a knife and breach of bond. Mitigation factors were considered, including lack of prior custodial sentence and head injury, sufficient for special circumstances, but little weight was given to provocation or remorse. Accordingly, a twenty-year sentence with a fourteen-year non-parole period was imposed.
Court Disposition
sentence imposed
Orders
- ['Sentence of 20 years commencing 16 December 2001 and ending 15 December 2021.' 'Non-parole period of 14 years expiring 15 December 2015.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment