Tyree v Ward & Ors [2016] NSWSC 135

Tyree v Ward & Ors [2016] NSWSC 135

Leave to further amend was refused because the proposed amended statement of claim did not disclose any arguable cause of action beyond the family provision claim. The deeds and alleged representations did not provide an unconditional right to equal estate or trust benefits, did not support the orders sought, and did not establish any arguable breach by the executors or other defendants. Given repeated unsuccessful attempts to formulate viable claims, the proceedings were dismissed save for the claim for further provision under the Succession Act 2006.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings Concerning Estate Related Contractual, Estoppel and Family Provision Claims / Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim and Defendants' Application to Dismiss Proceedings Save for the Succession Act Claim
Outcome
Plaintiff's notices of motion dismissed; defendants' notice of motion granted to dismiss the proceedings save for the Succession Act family provision claim; proceedings stood over to the Family Provision List.
Legal Topics
['leave to Amend Statement of Claim' 'dismissal of Proceedings' 'family Provision' 'constructive Trust' 'proprietary Estoppel' 'specific Performance' 'deed of Settlement' 'siblings Deed' 'oral Representations']
['practice and Procedure' 'succession' 'equity' 'contract' 'estoppel'] ['leave to Amend Statement of Claim' 'dismissal of Proceedings' 'family Provision' 'constructive Trust' 'proprietary Estoppel' 'specific Performance' 'deed of Settlement' 'siblings Deed' 'oral Representations']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceedings Concerning Estate Related Contractual, Estoppel and Family Provision Claims / Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim and Defendants' Application to Dismiss Proceedings Save for the Succession Act Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the plaintiff's further amended statement of claim disclosed an arguable cause of action beyond the claim for further provision under the Succession Act 2006." "Whether the plaintiff's renewed application for leave to amend was an abuse of process following earlier unsuccessful attempts to plead claims." 'Whether the deeds of 16 May 2013 and alleged oral representations supported claims to equal estate or trust benefits, specific performance, declarations, equitable damages, or reinstatement of earlier proceedings.' "Whether the defendants' motion to dismiss the proceedings, except for the Succession Act claim, should be granted."]

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to further amend was refused because the proposed amended statement of claim did not disclose any arguable cause of action beyond the family provision claim. The deeds and alleged representations did not provide an unconditional right to equal estate or trust benefits, did not support the orders sought, and did not establish any arguable breach by the executors or other defendants. Given repeated unsuccessful attempts to formulate viable claims, the proceedings were dismissed save for the claim for further provision under the Succession Act 2006.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's notices of motion dismissed; defendants' notice of motion granted to dismiss the proceedings save for the Succession Act family provision claim; proceedings stood over to the Family Provision List.

Orders

  • ['The notice of motion filed on 14 October 2015, the amended notice of motion filed on 24 November 2015, and the amended notice of motion filed on 23 December 2015 by the plaintiff Christopher Tyree be dismissed.' 'Save in so far as they concern a claim by the plaintiff for further provision pursuant to the...