Wyer v International Capital Markets Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 284
There being no reason to take a different approach to substituted service from the earlier, similar proceeding, the Court granted leave for substituted service on the Second Respondent via email, registered mail and through the First Respondent, as prescribed by the Federal Court Rules.
- Parties
- Applicant: Christopher Wyer; First Respondent: International Capital Markets Pty Ltd ACN 123 289 109; Second Respondent: Andrew Leon Budzinski
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Representative Proceeding / Interlocutory Application for Substituted Service
- Outcome
- Interlocutory application for substituted service granted in part; remaining application dismissed; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Service Out of Jurisdiction, Substituted Service, Contracts for Difference, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Unconscionable Conduct, Conflicted Remuneration, Retail Product Distribution Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Wyer
Applicant
International Capital Markets Pty Ltd ACN 123 289 109
First Respondent
Andrew Leon Budzinski
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceeding / Interlocutory Application for Substituted Service
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to serve the Second Respondent outside Australia by substituted service
- 2 Whether substituted service methods are appropriate given the location and circumstances of the Second Respondent
Ratio Decidendi
There being no reason to take a different approach to substituted service from the earlier, similar proceeding, the Court granted leave for substituted service on the Second Respondent via email, registered mail and through the First Respondent, as prescribed by the Federal Court Rules.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory application for substituted service granted in part; remaining application dismissed; costs reserved.
Orders
- Applicant has leave to serve Ancillary Documents outside Australia pursuant to r 10.44 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
- Applicant may effect service on Second Respondent by email, registered mail, and via First Respondent as per r 10.24 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment