(Re Mourikis) Comcare v Patrick Operations Pty Ltd [2010] NSWDDT 6
The requested modification that Patrick Operations Pty Ltd not be assumed liable was refused because it would be inimical to the effective operation of the Claims Resolution Process; the contribution regime requires the determination to proceed as if the cross-defendant is liable, while preserving avenues to dispute apportionment, obtain evidence, and contend for variation of the standard presumption.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Dust Diseases Tribunal Claim and Cross Claim for Contribution or Indemnity / Ruling After Plaintiff's Claim Was Removed From the Claims Resolution Process and Mediation; Application Concerning Appointment of a Contributions Assessor and Modification of the Contribution Process
- Outcome
- The application by Patrick Operations Pty Ltd for modification of the contribution determination was declined; a Contributions Assessor was to be appointed and procedural directions were made.
- Legal Topics
- ['claims Resolution Process' 'contribution and Indemnity' 'apportionment' 'appointment of Contributions Assessor' 'standard Presumptions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Dust Diseases Tribunal Claim and Cross Claim for Contribution or Indemnity / Ruling After Plaintiff's Claim Was Removed From the Claims Resolution Process and Mediation; Application Concerning Appointment of a Contributions Assessor and Modification of the Contribution Process
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Registrar should appoint a Contributions Assessor to determine the liability Comcare and Patrick Operations Pty Ltd should bear to pay the plaintiff's damages." 'Whether the reference to the Contributions Assessor should be modified under cl 22(7)(a)(ii) so that Patrick Operations Pty Ltd should not be assumed to be liable.']
Ratio Decidendi
The requested modification that Patrick Operations Pty Ltd not be assumed liable was refused because it would be inimical to the effective operation of the Claims Resolution Process; the contribution regime requires the determination to proceed as if the cross-defendant is liable, while preserving avenues to dispute apportionment, obtain evidence, and contend for variation of the standard presumption.
Court Disposition
The application by Patrick Operations Pty Ltd for modification of the contribution determination was declined; a Contributions Assessor was to be appointed and procedural directions were made.
Orders
- ["In the plaintiff's action there will be verdict and judgment in accordance with par 1 of the Order. The President noted pars 2, 3, 4 and 5." 'The Registrar is to appoint a Contributions Assessor within 21 days.' 'The cross-defendant to file a reply within 14 days.' 'The apportionment is to be completed within 28...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment