Jack v NSW Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages [2019] NSWCATAD 200
The Tribunal found, based on contemporary documents and statutory declarations, that the deceased and Ms McLachlan began a relationship in late 2015, cohabited at Richmond and Glenmore Park with periods of joint residence, financial interdependence, shared household duties, engagement and mutual plans for marriage, thus fulfilling s 21C Interpretation Act criteria for a de facto relationship. The applicant did not establish, on the balance of probabilities, that removing Ms McLachlan from the death certificate was justified; the Registrar's decision was affirmed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Christy Jack; First Respondent: NSW Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages; Second Respondent: Leanne McLachlan
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Review of Administrative Decision / Final Hearing and Orders
- Outcome
- Review application dismissed; Registrar's decision affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Correction of Death Register, De Facto Relationships, Criteria for De Facto Status, Evidentiary Standards in Administrative Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christy Jack
Applicant
NSW Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages
First Respondent
Leanne McLachlan
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review of Administrative Decision / Final Hearing and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased and Leanne McLachlan were in a de facto relationship for the purposes of the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1995 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the death certificate should be amended by removing Leanne McLachlan as de facto spouse
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, based on contemporary documents and statutory declarations, that the deceased and Ms McLachlan began a relationship in late 2015, cohabited at Richmond and Glenmore Park with periods of joint residence, financial interdependence, shared household duties, engagement and mutual plans for marriage, thus fulfilling s 21C Interpretation Act criteria for a de facto relationship. The applicant did not establish, on the balance of probabilities, that removing Ms McLachlan from the death certificate was justified; the Registrar's decision was affirmed.
Court Disposition
Review application dismissed; Registrar's decision affirmed.
Orders
- Decision under review affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment