Han v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1046
Since the Tribunal rejected the applicant's claims concerning political activity and the resulting need to avoid official attention, it was unnecessary for the Tribunal to make findings on whether the applicant avoided attention by going to Jiangxi. The Tribunal's reasons met the requirements of s 430(1)(c).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Order of Review / Judgment on Application for Review
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'procedural Fairness' 'refugee Status Determination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Order of Review / Judgment on Application for Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to set out its findings on a material question of fact as required by s 430(1)(c) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether procedures required by the Migration Act were observed in making the decision']
Ratio Decidendi
Since the Tribunal rejected the applicant's claims concerning political activity and the resulting need to avoid official attention, it was unnecessary for the Tribunal to make findings on whether the applicant avoided attention by going to Jiangxi. The Tribunal's reasons met the requirements of s 430(1)(c).
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the proceeding.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment