Kim v Lee & Ors (No 4) [2006] NSWSC 1215

Kim v Lee & Ors (No 4) [2006] NSWSC 1215

The plaintiff's primary agency-based claims were not pressed because there was no evidence of actual or ostensible authority. On the secondary claims, the evidence could not support findings that Yun Hwa Lee or Mi Jin Lee agreed to pay the plaintiff $200,000 or to indemnify him in respect of the District Court proceedings. Accordingly, on the evidence given, judgment for the plaintiff could not be supported and the proceedings were dismissed under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 29.9.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Supreme Court Civil Proceedings Concerning Alleged Settlement Agreements and Specific Performance / Defendants' Application at the Close of the Plaintiff's Case for Dismissal Under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, R 29.9
Outcome
Plaintiff's proceedings dismissed. Plaintiff ordered to pay defendants' costs.
Legal Topics
['dismissal of Proceedings' 'uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, R 29.9' 'specific Performance' 'alleged Settlement Agreements' 'agency Authority' 'indemnity']
['civil Procedure' 'equity' 'contract Law'] ['dismissal of Proceedings' 'uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, R 29.9' 'specific Performance' 'alleged Settlement Agreements' 'agency Authority' 'indemnity']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Supreme Court Civil Proceedings Concerning Alleged Settlement Agreements and Specific Performance / Defendants' Application at the Close of the Plaintiff's Case for Dismissal Under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, R 29.9

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether, on the evidence given, a judgment for the plaintiff could be supported under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 29.9.' 'Whether there was evidence that Yun Hwa Lee agreed to pay $200,000 to the plaintiff and indemnify him in respect of the District Court proceedings.' 'Whether there was evidence that Mi Jin Lee agreed to pay $200,000 to the plaintiff and indemnify him in respect of the District Court proceedings.' 'Whether alleged agency-based settlement claims could proceed in the absence of evidence of actual or ostensible authority.']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff's primary agency-based claims were not pressed because there was no evidence of actual or ostensible authority. On the secondary claims, the evidence could not support findings that Yun Hwa Lee or Mi Jin Lee agreed to pay the plaintiff $200,000 or to indemnify him in respect of the District Court proceedings. Accordingly, on the evidence given, judgment for the plaintiff could not be supported and the proceedings were dismissed under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 29.9.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's proceedings dismissed. Plaintiff ordered to pay defendants' costs.

Orders

  • ["The plaintiff's proceedings are dismissed." "The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs."]