Kemthong v Griffith City Council [2012] NSWLEC 1001
The appropriate method of measuring separation is walking distance, not radial distance, which ensures the policy's objective to minimise social impact and nuisance is met. The site meets the numerical separation requirement, complies with qualitative and quantitative policy controls, and addresses objector concerns through adequate conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'brothel Regulation' 'separation Distance' 'planning Controls']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Compliance with council's planning controls regarding brothel location" 'Measurement of separation distance from sensitive land uses' 'Impact of existing residential use on application']
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate method of measuring separation is walking distance, not radial distance, which ensures the policy's objective to minimise social impact and nuisance is met. The site meets the numerical separation requirement, complies with qualitative and quantitative policy controls, and addresses objector concerns through adequate conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['Appeal upheld' "Development application No. 62/2010 for internal alterations and use ground floor premises at No. 8 Hams Street, Griffith as a brothel is approved on the basis of a deferred commencement consent and subject to conditions included in Annexure 'A'." 'Exhibits, other than exhibits A and 1, are returned']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment