Yilan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 854
The appeal failed because the primary judge did not err in refusing to admit the additional evidence, the Tribunal was not shown to have breached any reviewable duty to inquire further into the Ankara demonstration or police documents, the statutory no evidence ground was not made out, the Tribunal was entitled to...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Refugee Protection Visa Judicial Review Appeal / Full Court Appeal From Dismissal of Judicial Review Application Concerning Refugee Review Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'duty to Inquire' 'no Evidence Ground of Review' 'admissibility of Evidence on Judicial Review' 'section 420 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)' 'medical Evidence and Factual Substratum']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Immigration Refugee Protection Visa Judicial Review Appeal / Full Court Appeal From Dismissal of Judicial Review Application Concerning Refugee Review Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the primary judge erred in refusing to admit additional evidence concerning an alleged Ankara demonstration.' 'Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal was obliged to inquire further into the authenticity of police documents tendered by the appellant.' "Whether the Tribunal's finding concerning the alleged Ankara demonstration was reviewable on a no evidence ground or for inadequate inquiry." 'Whether the Tribunal erred in rejecting medical evidence where it did not accept the factual substratum for the diagnosis.' 'Whether breach of s 420(2)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) could found a ground of review under s 476.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal failed because the primary judge did not err in refusing to admit the additional evidence, the Tribunal was not shown to have breached any reviewable duty to inquire further into the Ankara demonstration or police documents, the statutory no evidence ground was not made out, the Tribunal was entitled to reject medical evidence founded on traumatic events it positively disbelieved, and alleged non-compliance with s 420(2)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) did not found a ground of review under s 476 after Eshetu.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment