CIMIC Group Limited v AIG Australia Limited (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 93
The appropriate order is that the unsuccessful party in each motion should pay the successful party's costs; CIMIC was successful in resisting Mr Savage's application and in setting aside the AIG Subpoena, and ASIC's costs of compliance with the subpoena should be paid by CIMIC.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: CIMIC Group Limited; First Defendant: AIG Australia Limited; Applicant: David Savage; Subpoenaed Party: Commissioner of Police, Australian Federal Police; Subpoenaed Party: Australian Securities and Investments Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial List Equity / Costs Determination After Interlocutory Motions
- Outcome
- Costs orders made
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Subpoena, Application to Set Aside Subpoena
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CIMIC Group Limited
Plaintiff
AIG Australia Limited
First Defendant
David Savage
Applicant
Commissioner of Police, Australian Federal Police
Subpoenaed Party
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Subpoenaed Party
Procedural Posture
Commercial List Equity / Costs Determination After Interlocutory Motions
Legal Issues
- 1 Who should bear the costs of two motions to set aside subpoenas?
- 2 Which party should pay the costs of compliance with a subpoena?
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate order is that the unsuccessful party in each motion should pay the successful party's costs; CIMIC was successful in resisting Mr Savage's application and in setting aside the AIG Subpoena, and ASIC's costs of compliance with the subpoena should be paid by CIMIC.
Court Disposition
Costs orders made
Orders
- David Savage to pay CIMIC's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion filed by Mr Savage on 8 July 2021 seeking to set aside the ASIC subpoena issued on 7 June 2021.
- AIG Australia Limited to pay CIMIC's costs of and incidental to CIMIC's notice of motion filed 30 July 2021 seeking to set aside the AFP subpoena issued on 18 June 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment