CIW17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1133

CIW17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1133

No jurisdictional error was established. The Authority considered the appellant's claims, country information and risk profile, and it was open to it to find that he had only a low profile with Sri Lankan authorities and did not face a real chance of serious harm or a real risk of significant harm on return, including during possible detention for illegal departure. The Authority was not required to seek further information under s 473DC about the nature of the appellant's forced confession because the alleged gap was an absence of detail in the appellant's own case, and the Authority correctly understood and applied the real chance and real risk tests.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From Decision Dismissing Application for Judicial Review of an Immigration Assessment Authority Decision / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (division 2)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa Refusal' 'safe Haven Enterprise Visa' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'relevant Consideration' 'country Information' 'real Chance of Persecution' 'real Risk of Significant Harm' 'section 473 DC Discretion']
['migration' 'administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights'] ['protection Visa Refusal' 'safe Haven Enterprise Visa' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'relevant Consideration' 'country Information' 'real Chance of Persecution' 'real Risk of Significant Harm' 'section 473 DC Discretion']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal From Decision Dismissing Application for Judicial Review of an Immigration Assessment Authority Decision / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (division 2)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to consider material relating to abuse of human rights in Sri Lanka, including torture.' 'Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to consider whether the appellant had a real chance of suffering serious harm or significant harm while detained or otherwise under the control of Sri Lankan authorities on return as an illegal emigrant.' "Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority erred by not seeking new information under s 473DC of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) about whether the appellant's forced confession to LTTE involvement was general or specific." 'Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority misapplied the "real chance" test for persecution and the "real risk" test for significant harm.']

Ratio Decidendi

No jurisdictional error was established. The Authority considered the appellant's claims, country information and risk profile, and it was open to it to find that he had only a low profile with Sri Lankan authorities and did not face a real chance of serious harm or a real risk of significant harm on return, including during possible detention for illegal departure. The Authority was not required to seek further information under s 473DC about the nature of the appellant's forced confession because the alleged gap was an absence of detail in the appellant's own case, and the Authority correctly understood and applied the real chance and real risk tests.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal, to be assessed in absence of agreement."]