CJE26 v Regina [2019] NSWCCA 139
The Court of Criminal Appeal does not have jurisdiction to entertain an application for removal from the Child Protection Register where inclusion follows automatically from conviction for a class 1 or class 2 offence, as this is not an appealable conviction or sentence under the Criminal Appeal Act 1912.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Inclusion in Child Protection Register
- Outcome
- Application dismissed as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- ['child Protection Register' 'reporting Obligations' 'jurisdiction of Appellate Court' 'extension of Time']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Inclusion in Child Protection Register
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Does the Court of Criminal Appeal have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from inclusion in the Child Protection Register following conviction for a class 1 or class 2 offence?' 'Can the applicant be removed from the Register where inclusion followed automatically from conviction and not a separate court order?']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Criminal Appeal does not have jurisdiction to entertain an application for removal from the Child Protection Register where inclusion follows automatically from conviction for a class 1 or class 2 offence, as this is not an appealable conviction or sentence under the Criminal Appeal Act 1912.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed as incompetent
Orders
- ['Application dismissed as incompetent']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment