CJU v SafeWork NSW [2018] NSWCATAD 171
None of the Tribunal's conduct or decisions during the hearing, including evidentiary rulings, directions, or procedural management, were indicative of bias or gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. There was no demonstrated logical connection between the circumstances identified and a likelihood of prejudgment or partiality. Accordingly, the application for recusal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: CJU; Respondent: SafeWork NSW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Interlocutory Recusal Application
- Outcome
- Application for recusal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Actual Bias, Apprehended Bias, Recusal of Tribunal Member, Procedural Fairness, Privacy Breach Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CJU
Applicant
SafeWork NSW
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Interlocutory Recusal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal member should recuse themself for actual or apprehended bias arising from conduct during the hearing.
Ratio Decidendi
None of the Tribunal's conduct or decisions during the hearing, including evidentiary rulings, directions, or procedural management, were indicative of bias or gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. There was no demonstrated logical connection between the circumstances identified and a likelihood of prejudgment or partiality. Accordingly, the application for recusal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for recusal dismissed.
Orders
- Application that Senior Member recuse themself is dismissed.
- Matter to be fixed for directions hearing to set new date for completion of the hearing and consider further directions as sought by parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment