CJU v SafeWork NSW [2018] NSWCATAD 171

CJU v SafeWork NSW [2018] NSWCATAD 171

None of the Tribunal's conduct or decisions during the hearing, including evidentiary rulings, directions, or procedural management, were indicative of bias or gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. There was no demonstrated logical connection between the circumstances identified and a likelihood of prejudgment or partiality. Accordingly, the application for recusal was dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: CJU; Respondent: SafeWork NSW
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Interlocutory Recusal Application
Outcome
Application for recusal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Actual Bias, Apprehended Bias, Recusal of Tribunal Member, Procedural Fairness, Privacy Breach Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CJU

Applicant

SafeWork NSW

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Administrative Review / Interlocutory Recusal Application

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal member should recuse themself for actual or apprehended bias arising from conduct during the hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

None of the Tribunal's conduct or decisions during the hearing, including evidentiary rulings, directions, or procedural management, were indicative of bias or gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. There was no demonstrated logical connection between the circumstances identified and a likelihood of prejudgment or partiality. Accordingly, the application for recusal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for recusal dismissed.

Orders

  • Application that Senior Member recuse themself is dismissed.
  • Matter to be fixed for directions hearing to set new date for completion of the hearing and consider further directions as sought by parties.