R v CK [2004] NSWCCA 116

R v CK [2004] NSWCCA 116

Despite the applicant's youth, favourable rehabilitation prospects and remorse, the original sentence was found by Sperling J to be manifestly excessive given the factual circumstances and context of fear and group violence; the proper sentence, considering all subjective and objective factors, was five years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years and six months.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 April 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal: Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed. Original sentence quashed. New sentence substituted: imprisonment for five years with a non-parole period of two years and six months, order to serve time in detention centre until age 21.
Legal Topics
['severity of Sentence' 'appeal by Offender' 'youth Offenders' 'manslaughter' 'sentencing Principles' 'manifest Excess']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal: Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence for manslaughter was manifestly excessive' 'Whether the sentencing judge failed to consider or take properly into account all relevant circumstances at the time the applicant committed the offence']

Ratio Decidendi

Despite the applicant's youth, favourable rehabilitation prospects and remorse, the original sentence was found by Sperling J to be manifestly excessive given the factual circumstances and context of fear and group violence; the proper sentence, considering all subjective and objective factors, was five years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years and six months.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed. Original sentence quashed. New sentence substituted: imprisonment for five years with a non-parole period of two years and six months, order to serve time in detention centre until age 21.

Orders

  • ['(1) Grant leave to appeal;' '(2) Appeal allowed;' '(3) Sentence quashed, and in lieu thereof applicant sentenced to imprisonment for five years from 11 October 2002 with a non-parole period of two years and six months expiring 10 April 2005;' '(4) Order under s19 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act: serve required...