R v CK [2004] NSWCCA 116
Despite the applicant's youth, favourable rehabilitation prospects and remorse, the original sentence was found by Sperling J to be manifestly excessive given the factual circumstances and context of fear and group violence; the proper sentence, considering all subjective and objective factors, was five years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years and six months.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal: Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed. Original sentence quashed. New sentence substituted: imprisonment for five years with a non-parole period of two years and six months, order to serve time in detention centre until age 21.
- Legal Topics
- ['severity of Sentence' 'appeal by Offender' 'youth Offenders' 'manslaughter' 'sentencing Principles' 'manifest Excess']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal: Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence for manslaughter was manifestly excessive' 'Whether the sentencing judge failed to consider or take properly into account all relevant circumstances at the time the applicant committed the offence']
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the applicant's youth, favourable rehabilitation prospects and remorse, the original sentence was found by Sperling J to be manifestly excessive given the factual circumstances and context of fear and group violence; the proper sentence, considering all subjective and objective factors, was five years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years and six months.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed. Original sentence quashed. New sentence substituted: imprisonment for five years with a non-parole period of two years and six months, order to serve time in detention centre until age 21.
Orders
- ['(1) Grant leave to appeal;' '(2) Appeal allowed;' '(3) Sentence quashed, and in lieu thereof applicant sentenced to imprisonment for five years from 11 October 2002 with a non-parole period of two years and six months expiring 10 April 2005;' '(4) Order under s19 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act: serve required...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment