CKF16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1492
The appellant failed to provide an adequate explanation for non-appearance in the Federal Circuit Court and advanced no meritorious grounds for appeal; the course taken by the Circuit Judge was consistent with procedural rules; thus, there was no basis to grant leave to appeal or to disturb the Circuit Court's decision.
- Parties
- Appellant: CKF16; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court to the Federal Court
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed; appeal dismissed as incompetent; costs ordered against appellant.
- Legal Topics
- Protection Visas, Judicial Review, Interlocutory Orders, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CKF16
Appellant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court to the Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Circuit Court decision refusing a protection visa and dismissing the application for non-appearance
- 2 Whether the Circuit Judge erred in dismissing the application upon non-appearance
- 3 Whether the Tribunal or delegate failed to consider relevant claims or integers of claims
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to provide an adequate explanation for non-appearance in the Federal Circuit Court and advanced no meritorious grounds for appeal; the course taken by the Circuit Judge was consistent with procedural rules; thus, there was no basis to grant leave to appeal or to disturb the Circuit Court's decision.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed; appeal dismissed as incompetent; costs ordered against appellant.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal be dismissed;
- The appeal be dismissed as incompetent;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment