CKX16 v Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia [2018] FCA 400

CKX16 v Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia [2018] FCA 400

The Federal Circuit Court failed to consider a substantive ground of review (concerning the construction and application of s 36(2)(aa) Migration Act), which was raised by the applicant in the extension of time application. This failure constituted a constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction and a breach of procedural fairness, justifying the issue of certiorari and mandamus.

Parties
Applicant: CKX16; First Respondent: Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia; Second Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Third Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application Under S 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth)
Outcome
Allowed (application granted)
Legal Topics
Extension of Time Applications, Jurisdictional Error, Procedural Fairness, Judicial Review Under S 39 B Judiciary Act 1903, Interpretation of S 477 Migration Act 1958

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CKX16

Applicant

Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia

First Respondent

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Second Respondent

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment on Application Under S 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth)

  1. 1 Whether the Federal Circuit Court failed to consider a ground of review raised by the applicant
  2. 2 Whether such failure amounted to jurisdictional error or breach of procedural fairness in determination of an extension of time application under s 477(2) Migration Act 1958

Ratio Decidendi

The Federal Circuit Court failed to consider a substantive ground of review (concerning the construction and application of s 36(2)(aa) Migration Act), which was raised by the applicant in the extension of time application. This failure constituted a constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction and a breach of procedural fairness, justifying the issue of certiorari and mandamus.

Court Disposition

Allowed (application granted)

Orders

  • A writ of certiorari quashing the decision and orders of the Federal Circuit Court below.
  • A writ of mandamus directing the Federal Circuit Court, differently constituted, to determine the applicant's application for extension of time in accordance with law.