Kennard v Fite (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1456
The Court granted the Notice of Motion, finding the requested correction related to an error arising from accidental slip or omission and was consistent with the intention of the original orders, with consent from all parties.
- Parties
- Applicant: Claire Kennard; First Respondent: David Matthew Fite; Second Respondent: Danita Rae Lowes
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Post Judgment Correction Via Notice of Motion (slip Rule)
- Outcome
- Application granted; slip rule correction to original pruning orders
- Legal Topics
- Tree Disputes, Slip Rule Correction, Neighbourhood Disputes, Pruning Specifications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claire Kennard
Applicant
David Matthew Fite
First Respondent
Danita Rae Lowes
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Post Judgment Correction Via Notice of Motion (slip Rule)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a minor correction to tree pruning orders is permissible under the slip rule
- 2 Clarification of tree identification and associated pruning requirements
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted the Notice of Motion, finding the requested correction related to an error arising from accidental slip or omission and was consistent with the intention of the original orders, with consent from all parties.
Court Disposition
Application granted; slip rule correction to original pruning orders
Orders
- The application is granted.
- Within 60 days, First and Second Respondent must prune trees 1, 1.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10 to specified heights and maintain them as per the amended order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment