Regina v Drew [2000] NSWCCA 384

Regina v Drew [2000] NSWCCA 384

Given the premeditated and aggravated nature of the wounding, use of a dangerous weapon, and the applicant’s serious criminal history, the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive despite the applicant’s background of deprivation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 August 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'aboriginal Disadvantage as Mitigating Factor' 'malicious Wounding']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'aboriginal Disadvantage as Mitigating Factor' 'malicious Wounding']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive given the circumstances and background of the offender']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the premeditated and aggravated nature of the wounding, use of a dangerous weapon, and the applicant’s serious criminal history, the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive despite the applicant’s background of deprivation.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Application for leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed']