EASTERN SUBURBS HARDWARE PTY LTD v LEVY [1988] NSWCA 39
The order as entered lacked clarity and the parties' differing interpretations led to confusion and non-compliance; the Court found it desirable to relieve the opponent of the consequence of breach and to clarify the obligation by extending time for compliance.
- Parties
- Claimant: Eastern Suburbs Hardware Pty Ltd; Opponent: Levy
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Motion for Stay/additional Motion
- Outcome
- Time for compliance with Order 5 extended; costs of the additional motion to be costs in the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Clarification of Orders, Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eastern Suburbs Hardware Pty Ltd
Claimant
Levy
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Motion for Stay/additional Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 disparity between pronounced and entered orders
- 2 clarification of obligations under court orders
Ratio Decidendi
The order as entered lacked clarity and the parties' differing interpretations led to confusion and non-compliance; the Court found it desirable to relieve the opponent of the consequence of breach and to clarify the obligation by extending time for compliance.
Court Disposition
Time for compliance with Order 5 extended; costs of the additional motion to be costs in the appeal.
Orders
- The Court extends time within which the opponent must comply with Order 5 as entered, until Tuesday 1 November 1988 at 4 pm.
- Costs of the additional motion are to be costs in the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment