Price v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 171

Price v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 171

The appellant's sentence was a sentence of 12 months imprisonment for the purposes of s 501(7)(c); no anterior choice of cancellation power attracting natural justice or legal reasonableness obligations was required before the mandatory s 501(3A) cancellation; and, reading the Tribunal's reasons as a whole, the Tribunal undertook its own assessment of the seriousness of the appellant's offending and did not misunderstand or fail to comply with Direction 90. The appeal therefore failed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 October 2023
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From Judgment Dismissing Application for Judicial Review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision Affirming Non Revocation of Mandatory Visa Cancellation Under S 501 Ca(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Appeal to Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['mandatory Visa Cancellation' 'character Test' 'substantial Criminal Record' 'revocation of Visa Cancellation' 'jurisdictional Error' 'natural Justice' 'legal Unreasonableness' 'direction 90' 'collateral Challenge to Cancellation Decision']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal From Judgment Dismissing Application for Judicial Review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision Affirming Non Revocation of Mandatory Visa Cancellation Under S 501 Ca(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Appeal to Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia

  1. 1 ["Whether the appellant's 12 month sentence commencing on 14 January 2016 and expiring on 13 January 2017 satisfied s 501(7)(c) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)." 'Whether the cancellation decision under s 501(3A) was legally ineffective because of denial of natural justice or legal unreasonableness concerning which cancellation power was exercised.' 'Whether the Tribunal misunderstood or failed to comply with para 8.1.1(1)(a)(i) of Direction 90 by treating violent offences as necessarily very serious and failing to undertake its own assessment of seriousness.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's sentence was a sentence of 12 months imprisonment for the purposes of s 501(7)(c); no anterior choice of cancellation power attracting natural justice or legal reasonableness obligations was required before the mandatory s 501(3A) cancellation; and, reading the Tribunal's reasons as a whole, the Tribunal undertook its own assessment of the seriousness of the appellant's offending and did not misunderstand or fail to comply with Direction 90. The appeal therefore failed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs."]