CLARK v AINSWORTH [1996] NSWCA 103
The case raises an important question regarding the interpretation of Carson which justifies granting leave to appeal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Clark; Respondent: Ainsworth
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; costs of the application are costs in the appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Clark
Applicant
Ainsworth
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of the High Court's statement in Carson
Ratio Decidendi
The case raises an important question regarding the interpretation of Carson which justifies granting leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; costs of the application are costs in the appeal
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Costs of the application are costs in the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment