Ward, Ben & Ors v The State of Western Australia & Anor Smith, Clarrie v The State of Western Australia & Ors [1995] FCA 1165
The appeals raised substantial arguable questions about the construction of s.237, and the Tribunal had found that sites of significance existed within the proposed licence areas and that exercise of Exploration Licence rights may lead to interference with those sites. Because the exact locations of those sites had not been disclosed, there remained a risk of inadvertent or unintended interference, and success on appeal could be overtaken by events. Rather than imposing a general stay, the Court made a protective conditional order requiring any licences issued before the appeals were heard to include conditions protecting the sites unless agreements with the applicants already provided...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeals on Questions of Law Pursuant to S.169 of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) From Determinations of the National Native Title Tribunal / Applications Under Sub S.170(2) of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) to Stay the Effect of the Tribunal's Determinations Pending the Hearing of the Appeals
- Outcome
- Protective conditional orders made; liberty to apply; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['future Acts' 'expedited Procedure' 'exploration Licences' 'stay Pending Appeal' 'sites of Particular Significance' 'national Native Title Tribunal Determinations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeals on Questions of Law Pursuant to S.169 of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) From Determinations of the National Native Title Tribunal / Applications Under Sub S.170(2) of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) to Stay the Effect of the Tribunal's Determinations Pending the Hearing of the Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeals raised an arguable case that the Tribunal erred in its construction and application of s.237 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).' 'Whether a stay or protective order was necessary to prevent material circumstances changing so that success in the appeals might be negated.' 'Whether proposed Exploration Licences should be subject to conditions protecting sites of particular significance pending determination of the appeals.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeals raised substantial arguable questions about the construction of s.237, and the Tribunal had found that sites of significance existed within the proposed licence areas and that exercise of Exploration Licence rights may lead to interference with those sites. Because the exact locations of those sites had not been disclosed, there remained a risk of inadvertent or unintended interference, and success on appeal could be overtaken by events. Rather than imposing a general stay, the Court made a protective conditional order requiring any licences issued before the appeals were heard to include conditions protecting the sites unless agreements with the applicants already provided...
Court Disposition
Protective conditional orders made; liberty to apply; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['If the State pursuant to the determinations of the Tribunal the subject of these appeals, decides to issue an Exploration Licence or Licences pending the hearing of the appeals and the State is not satisfied at the time of issue of the Licences that the proposed licensees have made agreements with the applicants...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment