Claudio Grizonic v Suzanne Ranken Suttor & ors; Dawn Wade v Suzanne Ranken Suttor (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 812

Claudio Grizonic v Suzanne Ranken Suttor & ors; Dawn Wade v Suzanne Ranken Suttor (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 812

Interest is awarded at the contractual rate for an assigned debt where such rate exists and the assignment does not affect entitlement; non-interest bearing debts attract court interest from demand. The costs of proceedings follow the event, with no reason to depart from ordinary rules, even where District or Local Court jurisdiction thresholds could have accommodated the dispute. No indemnity costs are warranted absent delinquency in defence, and principal solicitors are not made liable for wasted costs of an employed solicitor absent evidence of personal responsibility.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 June 2011
Procedural Posture
Consequential Orders / Post Judgment Orders and Determination of Costs
Outcome
Judgment for Ms Wade against Ms Suttor for $119,734 inclusive of interest; orders made for payment of funds to 66G trustees; costs orders as set out; Ms Wade's amended notice of motion dismissed.
Legal Topics
['interest on Debts' 'costs' 'court Jurisdiction' 'wasted Costs' 'assignment of Debt']
['equity' 'civil Procedure'] ['interest on Debts' 'costs' 'court Jurisdiction' 'wasted Costs' 'assignment of Debt']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Consequential Orders / Post Judgment Orders and Determination of Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Entitlement to interest on assigned and non-assigned debts' 'Computation of interest for judgment debt' 'Proper apportionment of costs between proceedings and parties' "Entitlement to costs when claim exceeds lower courts' jurisdiction" 'Responsibility of principal and employed solicitor for costs']

Ratio Decidendi

Interest is awarded at the contractual rate for an assigned debt where such rate exists and the assignment does not affect entitlement; non-interest bearing debts attract court interest from demand. The costs of proceedings follow the event, with no reason to depart from ordinary rules, even where District or Local Court jurisdiction thresholds could have accommodated the dispute. No indemnity costs are warranted absent delinquency in defence, and principal solicitors are not made liable for wasted costs of an employed solicitor absent evidence of personal responsibility.

Court Disposition

Judgment for Ms Wade against Ms Suttor for $119,734 inclusive of interest; orders made for payment of funds to 66G trustees; costs orders as set out; Ms Wade's amended notice of motion dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Order that funds in court to the credit of proceedings 2003/087265, including accrued interest, be paid out to Geoffrey David McDonald and Paul Andrew Leroy.' 'Declare that Geoffrey David McDonald and Paul Andrew Leroy are entitled to the sum of $3,557.88 (and accrued interest) held in trust at Yates Beaggi...