Croker v Philips Electronics Australia Limited [2000] FCA 1731

Croker v Philips Electronics Australia Limited [2000] FCA 1731

The applicant failed to provide good reason for the court to exercise its discretion to extend time, and the unlikelihood of leave to appeal being granted or of the appeal succeeding all point against granting the extension.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 November 2000
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time / Interlocutory Application Before Single Judge
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
['application for Extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Judgment' 'court Discretion']
['civil Procedure'] ['application for Extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Judgment' 'court Discretion']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time / Interlocutory Application Before Single Judge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the court should grant an extension of time to seek leave to appeal from an interlocutory judgment.']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide good reason for the court to exercise its discretion to extend time, and the unlikelihood of leave to appeal being granted or of the appeal succeeding all point against granting the extension.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The notice of motion be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondents' costs."]