Croker v Deputy Registrar of the High Court [2002] FCA 1343

The motion to vary or discharge the previous order was refused as any appeal would be premature; the applicant failed to demonstrate a real prospect of success on the arguments put forward.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 28 October 2002
Procedural Posture: Motion / Application to Vary or Discharge Previous Order
Outcome: motion refused
Legal Topics: ['application to Vary or Discharge Order' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'extension of Time']

['practice and Procedure'] ['application to Vary or Discharge Order' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'extension of Time']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Motion / Application to Vary or Discharge Previous Order

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the order dated 4 October 2002 dismissing application for leave to appeal should be varied or discharged']

Ratio Decidendi

The motion to vary or discharge the previous order was refused as any appeal would be premature; the applicant failed to demonstrate a real prospect of success on the arguments put forward.

Court Disposition

motion refused

Orders

['The motion to vary or discharge the order dated 4 October 2002 be refused.']