Croker v Deputy Registrar of the High Court [2002] FCA 1117

Croker v Deputy Registrar of the High Court [2002] FCA 1117

The applicant's claim of exemption from fees is premature, as he has not demonstrated a real need to photocopy material; leave is given to allow him an opportunity to satisfy the docket Judge.

Parties
Applicant: Clayton Robert Croker; First Respondent: Deputy Registrar of the High Court of Australia; Second Respondent: George Challoner
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 September 2002
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory
Outcome
application stood over
Legal Topics
Exemption From Photocopying Fees, Disability Pension, Federal Court Practice
Civil Procedure Exemption From Photocopying Fees Disability Pension Federal Court Practice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clayton Robert Croker

Applicant

Deputy Registrar of the High Court of Australia

First Respondent

George Challoner

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is exempt from photocopying fees by reason of Federal Court of Australia Regulations 1978 (Cth)

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's claim of exemption from fees is premature, as he has not demonstrated a real need to photocopy material; leave is given to allow him an opportunity to satisfy the docket Judge.

Court Disposition

application stood over

Orders

  • The application be stood over before me on 4 October 2002 at 10.00 am.