Croker v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation [1999] NSWDC 7

Croker v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation [1999] NSWDC 7

Based on the medical evidence available (Mr Vaughan's reports), the appellant's condition did not constitute 'shock' as defined by the Victims Compensation Act 1996, and therefore no compensable injury was established under the Act.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 September 1999
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Merits Disposition
Outcome
appeal dismissed after granting leave
Legal Topics
['victims Compensation' 'mental Injury' 'shock']
['compensation Law'] ['victims Compensation' 'mental Injury' 'shock']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Merits Disposition

  1. 1 ["Whether the applicant suffered 'shock' within the meaning of the Victims Compensation Act 1996 Schedule 1(5)"]

Ratio Decidendi

Based on the medical evidence available (Mr Vaughan's reports), the appellant's condition did not constitute 'shock' as defined by the Victims Compensation Act 1996, and therefore no compensable injury was established under the Act.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed after granting leave

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed' 'No order as to costs']