CLD v Children’s Guardian [2017] NSWSC 936
The Tribunal's failure to comply with s 50 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), including not affording parties an opportunity to make submissions or making the required order dispensing with a hearing, vitiated its decision. Procedural fairness was denied and the Tribunal's decision is set aside with the matter remitted for determination by a differently constituted Tribunal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review, Appeal / Principal Judgment, Appeal Allowed
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Tribunal decision set aside; proceedings remitted; costs awarded to plaintiff; suppression and pseudonym orders granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['procedural Fairness' 'non Publication Orders' 'administrative Review' 'working With Children Clearance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review, Appeal / Principal Judgment, Appeal Allowed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal failed to comply with s 50 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)' 'Whether the applicant was denied procedural fairness' 'Whether non-publication and pseudonym orders should be made']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's failure to comply with s 50 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), including not affording parties an opportunity to make submissions or making the required order dispensing with a hearing, vitiated its decision. Procedural fairness was denied and the Tribunal's decision is set aside with the matter remitted for determination by a differently constituted Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Tribunal decision set aside; proceedings remitted; costs awarded to plaintiff; suppression and pseudonym orders granted.
Orders
- ['Order pursuant to s 7 of the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), on the ground specified in s 8(1)(e), that the names and addresses of the plaintiff, any child referred to in evidence, and any other person whose publication would identify them not be published without leave of the Court.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment