Clean Energy Regulator v MT Solar Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 210
Paragraph 129 of the Reasons for Judgment published on 8 March 2013 contained arithmetical errors in the calculated penalty ranges, but the Court had intended to impose, and did impose, a penalty of $70,000 on MT Solar Pty Ltd; the reasons should therefore be amended by substituting the corrected paragraph 129.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Amendment of Reasons for Judgment / Post Judgment Correction of Arithmetical Errors in Penalty Calculations
- Outcome
- Reasons for Judgment published on 8 March 2013 amended by substituting a corrected paragraph 129; the penalty of $70,000 on MT Solar Pty Ltd was confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Reasons for Judgment' 'correction of Arithmetical Errors' 'penalty Calculation' 'co Operation Discount' 'totality Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Amendment of Reasons for Judgment / Post Judgment Correction of Arithmetical Errors in Penalty Calculations
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Reasons for Judgment published on 8 March 2013 should be amended to correct arithmetical errors in the calculated ranges of penalties referred to in paragraph 129.' 'Whether the correction affected the penalty of $70,000 imposed on MT Solar Pty Ltd.']
Ratio Decidendi
Paragraph 129 of the Reasons for Judgment published on 8 March 2013 contained arithmetical errors in the calculated penalty ranges, but the Court had intended to impose, and did impose, a penalty of $70,000 on MT Solar Pty Ltd; the reasons should therefore be amended by substituting the corrected paragraph 129.
Court Disposition
Reasons for Judgment published on 8 March 2013 amended by substituting a corrected paragraph 129; the penalty of $70,000 on MT Solar Pty Ltd was confirmed.
Orders
- ['Reasons for Judgment published on 8 March 2013 (Clean Energy Regulator v MT Solar Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 205) be amended by deleting [129] thereof and substituting therefor [129] as indicated in the attached Reasons for Judgment.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment