Cleland v The Queen [1982] HCA 67

Cleland v The Queen [1982] HCA 67

The conviction must be set aside and a new trial ordered because the trial judge seriously misdirected the jury on a critical factual matter relating to whether the police could have known certain facts alleged to have been in the applicant's confession, and failed to consider whether the confession should have been excluded on the ground of unfairness in addition to public policy. The error was sufficient to cause a miscarriage of justice and the competing public policy justifications for excluding illegally obtained evidence make the questions of exclusion sufficiently important for special leave to appeal to have been granted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal (special Leave Granted; Appeal Allowed; New Trial Ordered)
Outcome
Special leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed. Conviction set aside. New trial ordered.
Legal Topics
['admissibility of Confessions' 'judicial Discretion to Exclude Evidence' 'unlawful Detention' 'misdirection' 'public Policy and Exclusion of Evidence' 'fair Trial' 'voluntariness of Confessions']
['criminal Law'] ['admissibility of Confessions' 'judicial Discretion to Exclude Evidence' 'unlawful Detention' 'misdirection' 'public Policy and Exclusion of Evidence' 'fair Trial' 'voluntariness of Confessions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal (special Leave Granted; Appeal Allowed; New Trial Ordered)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the confession allegedly made by the applicant during unlawful detention should have been admitted in evidence' 'Whether the trial judge misdirected the jury on a critical factual issue relating to the confession' 'Whether the principles in Bunning v. Cross regarding the exclusion of unlawfully obtained evidence apply to confessional evidence']

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction must be set aside and a new trial ordered because the trial judge seriously misdirected the jury on a critical factual matter relating to whether the police could have known certain facts alleged to have been in the applicant's confession, and failed to consider whether the confession should have been excluded on the ground of unfairness in addition to public policy. The error was sufficient to cause a miscarriage of justice and the competing public policy justifications for excluding illegally obtained evidence make the questions of exclusion sufficiently important for special leave to appeal to have been granted.

Court Disposition

Special leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed. Conviction set aside. New trial ordered.

Orders

  • ['Order of the Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Criminal Appeal) set aside' 'Grant leave to appeal' 'Allow the appeal' 'Set aside the convictions' 'Order a new trial']