Gye v Laughton [2019] NSWSC 121

Gye v Laughton [2019] NSWSC 121

Leave to extend time to file for judicial review was refused because the plaintiff failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for delay, did not have an arguable case for judicial review, and discretionary factors (including absence of public interest and available statutory appeal rights) weighed against granting the extension. The Appeal Panel's decisions were found to be adequately reasoned, without error of law or jurisdictional error, and the procedural pathway chosen by the plaintiff was inappropriate.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 February 2019
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Decision on Leave to Extend Time for Filing Judicial Review
Outcome
Leave to extend time to file application for judicial review refused
Legal Topics
['leave to Appeal' 'extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'costs Assessment' 'duty to Give Reasons']
['civil Procedure'] ['leave to Appeal' 'extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'costs Assessment' 'duty to Give Reasons']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Decision on Leave to Extend Time for Filing Judicial Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court should grant leave to extend time to file an application for judicial review' 'Whether the Appeal Panel gave adequate reasons for its decision' 'Whether the Appeal Panel misconstrued the costs agreement' 'Whether the Appeal Panel erred in determining reasonable time for work claimed' 'Whether the Appeal Panel erred in costs orders']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to extend time to file for judicial review was refused because the plaintiff failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for delay, did not have an arguable case for judicial review, and discretionary factors (including absence of public interest and available statutory appeal rights) weighed against granting the extension. The Appeal Panel's decisions were found to be adequately reasoned, without error of law or jurisdictional error, and the procedural pathway chosen by the plaintiff was inappropriate.

Court Disposition

Leave to extend time to file application for judicial review refused

Orders

  • ['Leave to extend time for the plaintiff to file an application for judicial review is refused.' "The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs on an ordinary basis." 'The sum of $19,620.07 paid into Court by the plaintiff (together with interest accrued) be paid out to the first defendant.']