Clements v Bull [1953] HCA 61

Clements v Bull [1953] HCA 61

The regulation-making power under s. 138 of the Melbourne Harbor Trust Act 1928 (Vic) does not authorize a general prohibition on the holding of meetings or addressing assemblages within the port area without written consent, as such a regulation is not sufficiently and directly connected with the management and objects of the Act. The regulation transcends the purpose for which the power is given and is ultra vires.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['by Law or Regulation Making Powers' 'ultra Vires' 'public Land Management' 'port Regulation']
['administrative Law' 'statutory Interpretation'] ['by Law or Regulation Making Powers' 'ultra Vires' 'public Land Management' 'port Regulation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether regulation 275(36) made by the Melbourne Harbor Trust Commissioners is authorized by s. 138 of the Melbourne Harbor Trust Act 1928 (Vic)' 'Scope of regulation-making power of statutory authorities under the Act']

Ratio Decidendi

The regulation-making power under s. 138 of the Melbourne Harbor Trust Act 1928 (Vic) does not authorize a general prohibition on the holding of meetings or addressing assemblages within the port area without written consent, as such a regulation is not sufficiently and directly connected with the management and objects of the Act. The regulation transcends the purpose for which the power is given and is ultra vires.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs']