Clermont Residences Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2023] NSWLEC 1293
The proposal for modification satisfied statutory requirements, remained substantially the same development, and the parties' agreement could properly be made by the Court under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Parties
- Applicant: Clermont Residences Pty Ltd; Respondent: Woollahra Municipal Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Order After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent modified in accordance with the parties' agreement.
- Legal Topics
- Modification Application, Development Consent, Conciliation Conference, Jurisdictional Pre Requisites
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clermont Residences Pty Ltd
Applicant
Woollahra Municipal Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Order After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed modification application satisfied the requirements of s 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 2 Whether the proposed development as modified is substantially the same as the originally approved development
- 3 Whether jurisdictional pre-requisites for modification had been met
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal for modification satisfied statutory requirements, remained substantially the same development, and the parties' agreement could properly be made by the Court under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent modified in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development Consent No. 177/2020, as modified, is further modified by Modification Application No. 177/2020/3, subject to the consolidated conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment